#Ww1 grand strategy games Pc#
#Ww1 grand strategy games series#

#Ww1 grand strategy games Pc#

Out of which, it just so happens our period is defined as the gap between 'WW2 and 'WW4' and it includes 'WW3' and a great number of slightly smaller, but equally important wars between strongest military powers of world.Д®ach GP participated in many, many wars over time, large, small and actual WW1.Company of Heroes 2 is a tactical-heavy World War II real-time strategy PC game that focuses on unit-based tactics in battles in the Eastern Front theater. Now, if you want to go by 'continent spanning multi-year wars', strictly speaking you are down to 7years war, Napoleonic wars, WW1, WW2. At least period from Crimean war to Franko-Prussian had seen all 'great power' participate in war against there great power, or Civil War.ДЄlso, considering Japan, Russia, Prussia, and a number of smaller states industrialised to be competitive militarily, with GB, USA, France, Japan being very focused on naval industry to have competent navy, industrilisation in many cases happened to feed war industry, thus the second Pilar of the game should be using that military industrial complex to steamroll over less powerful and try to not be beaten by competitors. Right now the 99 years I mentioned earlier are still the longest period of peace between great powers in human history, which is made even more impressive considering war and death wasn't seen as it is now.Д¬lick to expand.Define industrialised and great powers, because your detention doesn't seem to match generally accepted. And while this doesn't mean that you can't have any warfare there, not at all evidently, it means that it shouldn't be the focus of a game and rather fade into the background just like military conflicts between great powers did IN COMPARISON to everything that came before and the 30 years after.

#Ww1 grand strategy games series#

But after all this post is meant to compare the game to the total war simulations of the HOI series and while I would very much enjoy an all-out glaobal war game set in the victorian era, it's just not historical. From the mechanical depiction of war against them to the fun of steamrolling natives. You are right that these happened, another user already pointed that out in another thread (even though most of these are rather questionable when it comes to industrialization or great-power status) Warfare against smaller and less industrialized nations poses several more problems. I was talking about wars between industrialized nations or great powers. Sorry for this sarcastic post, but this debate just gave me brainrot. So now the question is who had the stupid idea to set a game in that time? What is the player actually supposed to do in a game like this if war is such an unrealistic possibility for most of the game? How can they even call this a grand strategy game without you being in a constant circle of blobbing and slaughtering the ai? Every total war between multiple industrial nations would be completely ahistorical and unrealistic in at least the first three quarters of the game time. Of course there were wars, quite a few very interesting ones actually, but they were limited and mostly outside of Europe as most imperialist powers feared going to war against another industrialized nation, because they saw what the Napoleonic wars did to Europe. The 99 years from the fall of napoleon to the outbreak of ww1 were the most peaceful period in world history back then. Edit for clarity: Don't forget to read the last line of this post.